Animal welfare and ethical issues relevant to the humane control of vertebrate pests

Authors: Mellor DJ, Littin KE, Eason CT, Warburton B
Publication: New Zealand Veterinary Journal, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 1-10, Feb 2004
Publisher: Taylor and Francis

Animal type: Mustelid, Possum, Rabbit, Wildlife
Subject Terms: Animal remedies/veterinary medicines, Animal welfare, Biosecurity, Treatment/therapy, Environment, Ethics, Euthanasia, Animal handling, International, Legal/regulation, Pest/pesticides, Veterinary profession
Article class: Review Article
Abstract: Key points
·       Vertebrate pests and pest control impact on people, animals and the environment, so any ethical consideration of vertebrate pest control must incorporate the interests of all three.
·       The necessity of intervention, whether it involves killing animals or not, must be properly evaluated.
·       Justification for pest control is only tenable if all of the negative impacts (harms) on people, animals and the environment are minimised and all of the positive impacts (benefits) are maximised as far as can be feasibly achieved.
·       In all cases, the most humane control methods possible must be used; we must actively seek ways to improve the humaneness of existing methods and to find new methods that are more humane.
·       There are six major principles that guide the design and execution of ethically sound vertebrate pest control programmes.(1) The aims or benefits and the harms of each control programme must be clear.(2) Control must only be undertaken if the aims can be achieved.(3) The methods that most effectively achieve the aims of the control programme must be used.(4) The methods must be applied in the best possible way.(5) Whether or not each control programme actually achieved its precise aim must be assessed.(6) Once the desired aims or benefits have been achieved, steps must be taken to maintain the beneficial state.
·       An ideal pest control method would be effective and easy to use, affordable, safe for human users and for people exposed to it, humane, specific to the target species or individuals, and safe for the environment .Although such a gold standard is difficult to achieve, we can only retain ethical credibility if we conscientiously strive to make incremental improvements towards that gold standard.
Access to the full text of this article is available to members of:
  • SciQuest - Complimentary Subscription
If you're a member or subscriber and believe you should have access:
Login

Otherwise:
Register for an account