The difference in efficacy of ivermectin oral, moxidectin oral and moxidectin injectable formulations against an ivermectin-resistant strain of Trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep

Authors: Pomroy WE, Gopal RM, West DM
Publication: New Zealand Veterinary Journal, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 133-137, Aug 2001
Publisher: Taylor and Francis

Animal type: Livestock, Production animal, Ruminant, Sheep
Subject Terms: Alimentary system/gastroenterology, Animal remedies/veterinary medicines, Anthelmintics, Parasite control, Parasites - internal, Treatment/therapy, Nematode
Article class: Scientific Article

---

Abstract: AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of ivermectin oral, moxidectin oral and moxidectin injectable formulations against an ivermectin-resistant strain of Trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep.
METHODS: Twenty-four mixed breed lambs were infected with 15,000 infective third-stage larvae of an ivermectin-resistant strain of T. colubriformis which had originally been isolated from a goat farm in Northland in 1997. Twenty-six days post infection, the lambs were divided into 3 treatment groups and a control group (n=6 lambs/group). Treatment consisted of either ivermectin oral formulation (0.2 mg/kg), moxidectin oral formulation (0.2 mg/kg), or moxidectin injectable formulation (0.2 mg/kg). Faecal egg counts (FECs) were determined at 0, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days after treatment. All animals were necropsied 12 days after treatment and worm counts were performed. Larval development assays were conducted 24 days post infection. A further 3 lambs were infected with 15,000 infective third-stage larvae of a fully susceptible strain of T. colubriformis for comparative purposes in the larval development assay. The efficacy of the moxidectin injectable formulation was also confirmed in these 3 lambs.
RESULTS: The FEC reduction test at day 10 after treatment revealed 62%, 100% and 0% reductions in arithmetic-mean FECs for ivermectin oral, moxidectin oral and moxidectin injectable groups, respectively. The ivermectin oral, moxidectin oral and moxidectin injectable formulations achieved 62%, 98% and 4% reductions in arithmetic-mean worm burdens, respectively. Larval development assays showed resistance ratios for ivermectin of 4:1, avermectin B2 of 2.7:1, ivermectin aglycone of 37:1, moxidectin of 1.4:1, thiabendazole of 14.6:1 and levamisole of 1.8:1.
CONCLUSIONS: The moxidectin oral formulation provided a high degree of control against ivermectin-resistant T. colubriformis whereas the moxidectin injectable formulation had very low efficacy. Ivermectin aglycone was the analogue of choice for diagnosis of ivermectin resistance in T. colubriformis in the larval development assay.
KEY WORDS: Anthelmintic resistance, ivermectin resistance, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, moxidectin, pharmacokinetics.

---