More Information

Confusion reigns

Authors: Wiessing J
Publication: New Zealand Veterinary Journal, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 75, May 1986
Publisher: Taylor and Francis

Animal type: General
Subject Terms: Ethics, Veterinary profession
Article class: Correspondence

Abstract: I am confused. In Appendix 1 of the new Guide to Professional Conduct for Veterinarians in New Zealand I am informed that “The performance of surgical procedures for purely cosmetic purposes is deprecated and is totally unacceptable”. Amongst operations normally classified as being done purely for cosmetic purposes are ear cropping and tail docking of dogs. By common definition (Concise Oxford Dictionary) “deprecate” means disapproval of, etc. “Totally unacceptable” means completely intolerable. Which of these definitions most truly reflects the code`s intent? Does the intent imply unethical conduct? Do we as a profession at last have the courage to stand up and be counted!

Access to the full text of this article is available to members of:

SciQuest - Complimentary Subscription

If you're a member or subscriber and believe you should have access:
Login

Otherwise:
Register for an account