More Information
Prevalence and predictive value
Authors: Ris DRPublication: New Zealand Veterinary Journal, Volume 34, Issue 1-2, pp 12-13, Jan 1986
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Animal type: Livestock
Subject Terms: Diagnostic procedures, Disease surveillance, Epidemiology
Article class: Correspondence
Abstract: Since a number of animal diseases such as brucellosis and tuberculosis in cattle, and hydatids in sheep are now reaching a low prevalence (P: percentage of diseased animals in a population), it is perhaps appropriate to remind readers that prevalence has a marked influence on the accuracy with which a diagnostic test can identify diseased animals. Whereas an ideal test will give positive results with all diseased animals and negative results with all disease-free animals, the ideal is rarely attainable and most tests return some false positive and false negative results. Many published diagnostic tests have a sensitivity (Se: percentage of diseased animals with a positive result) and a specificity (Sp: percentage of disease-free animals with a negative result) of between 90 and 100%, and perform well when the prevalence of a particular disease is high. But, when it is low, as is the case when a disease is nearly..
Access to the full text of this article is available to members of:
- SciQuest - Complimentary Subscription
Login
Otherwise:
Register for an account